| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| which would you prefer? |
| 1vs1 |
|
18% |
[ 5 ] |
| grading system |
|
81% |
[ 22 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 27 |
|
| Author |
Message |
danimation Dojo Owner


Joined: 24 Dec 2007 Posts: 316
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:48 pm Post subject: Which would you prefer |
|
|
1 vs 1 like it is now
or
a grading system based on
Art
Creativity
Plot/story
Lowest scores will not pass this part of the tournament if the graded based system is selected. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
L.Z.X White Belt

Joined: 02 Feb 2008 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think one on one using this grading system
meaning the rounds will be one on one bot the winner betwen the 2 will be the one with the most point on art creativity etc.
wiche I blive it's the way it is now (is'nt it?) |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
hazara Green Belt


Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Posts: 82
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The 1vs1 system is ok by me, but I would rather have the overall best Art/Plot/Creativity pass the tournament.
Whatever wins is ok by me, but I think the Grading System is fairer.  _________________ www.hazara.deviantart.com
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Hunter-Wolf Orange Belt


Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 54 Location: Egypt
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with "Mechychan" that the first round would be better done using the grading system .. it also kinda fits what happened in the series ... but later on "one vs one" would be nice ... and also like the preliminary matches and finals from the series!!!
In the end its all to you Dan and the voters here ^_^ _________________ http://hunter-wolf.deviantart.com/
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Mechychan Green Belt


Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 104 Location: MI
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| hazara wrote: |
The 1vs1 system is ok by me, but I would rather have the overall best Art/Plot/Creativity pass the tournament.
Whatever wins is ok by me, but I think the Grading System is fairer.  |
I agree with you Hazara.
Well, when it's 1vs1 our chances of losing is 50%. In the series, everyone was pitted against everyone in a game of wits. So I think doing it on a grading system amongst everyone sticks more to the written plot of the series and gives better odds.
It also means we're all equally pitted against the more advanced people and the less advanced people.
Thankfully, Dan has made this portion a democracy amongst us artists and is allowing a vote. Thank you so much Dan! So majority wins and we'll have to accept that. ^_^
I wish everyone the best of luck! _________________ www.mechy-chan.deviantart.com
::WARNING side affects of prolonged exposure to mechy-chan may include chronic disgust & erectile dysfunction:: |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Ajust Blue Belt


Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 196
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think a grading system makes more sense for this specific part of the tournament. Considering what happened in Naruto, and that this tournament is based on those events, 1vs1 doesn't really seem appropriate to me.
Either way 50% go March 30. :/
Let's get settled already! lol |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Genko Blue Belt


Joined: 10 Feb 2008 Posts: 183
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I vote grading.
It's true we do have to cut the numbers down. And if the grading
is too hard thats fine we can do 1v1.
But with 1v1 lets say persons A is matched against person F.
And person B has already defeated person K.
A wins the match, but person K who lost in his own match
was considerably more creative than person A or F.
We now have lost one of our more creative competitors.
At least with a grading system, the more creative survive.
Makes more more interesting fights later on. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Yunni Purple Belt


Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 230 Location: Luton, UK
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
aspectabund Orange Belt


Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Posts: 54 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ahaha, we are SUCH bitches. XD "Dan, change this rule" "Dan, I think we should do this instead."
Anyway, I do think that an overall grade based on art, creativity and stuff makes more sense for this particular thing, since I don't think my opponents are even really featuring in mine, since I want to cheat off a proctor.
It depends how many people you want to knock off this round, really. Do you want 50% gone, or an unknown quantity? Either way is fine with me, since it's really just a grading decision on your part. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
soulrailer Green Belt


Joined: 21 Jan 2008 Posts: 114 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I voted for 1v1
but when I think about it, I would prefer the grade based system to see who gets to go to the next round (I would hate it if I fall out because of a genious idea of Cheve )
However, I still love the idea that we are assigned a person which we have to cheat of (like in the initial proposal)
anyway it is all fine by me,
gonna cheat on anyone you want and probably sabotage some people to  |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Eike Blue Belt


Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 180
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Grading system for this round actually sounds way more fair than the 1vs1 just because of what Mechy mentioned in the other topic. But I also agree that later on it should be a 1 vs 1 situation when it actually comes to the single fights. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
slave2f8 Purple Belt


Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 214 Location: Pasadena, CA, US, EARTH
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i think if you have it based on a grading system, a lot of people that get cut but are on the borderline will be mad, (since there won't be much difference between the lowest pass and the highest fail) whereas if you have an opponent it's more clear-cut.
and dan, you KNOW if you do it based on grading, the people who don't make it are gonna be hounding you forever with "DAN!!!! YOU SHOULDN'T CUT HALF THE PEOPLE!! LET MORE IN!" it'll be really hard. i mean, look at what a ruckus we're making now. lol.
besides, if we do it as a whole group instead of 1vs1, isn't it too much like the 2nd part of the exam? i dunno. i like having an opponent.
but i'll be happy either way.  _________________ http://slave2f8.deviantart.com/art/Why-Saskue-Really-Left-77984655
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Mechychan Green Belt


Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 104 Location: MI
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| slave2f8 wrote: |
i think if you have it based on a grading system, a lot of people that get cut but are on the borderline will be mad, (since there won't be much difference between the lowest pass and the highest fail) whereas if you have an opponent it's more clear-cut.
and dan, you KNOW if you do it based on grading, the people who don't make it are gonna be hounding you forever with "DAN!!!! YOU SHOULDN'T CUT HALF THE PEOPLE!! LET MORE IN!" it'll be really hard. i mean, look at what a ruckus we're making now. lol.
besides, if we do it as a whole group instead of 1vs1, isn't it too much like the 2nd part of the exam? i dunno. i like having an opponent.
but i'll be happy either way.  |
Well...If you think about it, there are 48 of us, and those 24 of us who beat our opponents will continue and 24 of us will lose...So no matter which way we choose, 50% of the people who entered are going to lose. At the end of this round there will only be 24 people left either way it goes. _________________ www.mechy-chan.deviantart.com
::WARNING side affects of prolonged exposure to mechy-chan may include chronic disgust & erectile dysfunction:: |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
danimation Dojo Owner


Joined: 24 Dec 2007 Posts: 316
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mechychan wrote: |
| slave2f8 wrote: |
i think if you have it based on a grading system, a lot of people that get cut but are on the borderline will be mad, (since there won't be much difference between the lowest pass and the highest fail) whereas if you have an opponent it's more clear-cut.
and dan, you KNOW if you do it based on grading, the people who don't make it are gonna be hounding you forever with "DAN!!!! YOU SHOULDN'T CUT HALF THE PEOPLE!! LET MORE IN!" it'll be really hard. i mean, look at what a ruckus we're making now. lol.
besides, if we do it as a whole group instead of 1vs1, isn't it too much like the 2nd part of the exam? i dunno. i like having an opponent.
but i'll be happy either way.  |
Well...If you think about it, there are 48 of us, and those 24 of us who beat our opponents will continue and 24 of us will lose...So no matter which way we choose, 50% of the people who entered are going to lose. At the end of this round there will only be 24 people left either way it goes. |
However those that would have made it through to the next round might not make it with the grading system of cutting people in half.
I'll leave this open for a little while to see what everyone thinks.
But as of now the game is on regardless of how this is going to be judged. Either by judges or by a grading system, all should be going now as planned.
Do your best. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
slave2f8 Purple Belt


Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 214 Location: Pasadena, CA, US, EARTH
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
I'll leave this open for a little while to see what everyone thinks.
But as of now the game is on regardless of how this is going to be judged. Either by judges or by a grading system, all should be going now as planned.
Do your best. |
HAI!  _________________ http://slave2f8.deviantart.com/art/Why-Saskue-Really-Left-77984655
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
|